ZBA02-2024 Martin Zoning Bylaw Amendment

 

NOTICE OF DECISION - COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT

APPLICATIONS FOR MINOR VARIANCE OR PERMISSION

Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, cP. 13., S. 45 (8)

 

FILE NO: MTu MV02-24                      DATE OF HEARING: June 18, 2024

NOTICE:                The last day for appealing this decision July 8, 2024.

APPEALS:            The applicant, the Minister or any other person or public body who has an interest in the matter may within 20 days of the making of the decision appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal against the decision of the committee by filing with the secretary-treasurer of the committee a notice of appeal setting out the objection to the decision and the reasons in support of the objection accompanied by payment to the secretary-treasurer of the fee charged by the Tribunal under the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act, 2017 as payable on an appeal from a committee of adjustment to the Tribunal. 

APPLICANT:         William Bechard for Elias and Minerva Weber

LOCATION OF PROPERTY:               Concession C, SPT Lot 6, NPT Lot 7 Turnberry (90715 Belmore Line)

PURPOSE OF APPLICATION:            

The purpose of this application is to reduce the side yard setback requirement for an existing shed for a proposed lot line adjustment (see consent application C22-2024).

The application proposes to reduce the interior side yard setback for an existing shed to a minimum of 2.5m.

DATE OF DECISION:                           June 18, 2024

DECISION:            To grant relief from the following Sections of By-law 45-2014:

Section 4.4.3.2, to reduce the required side yard setback from 7.5m to a minimum of 2.5m for an existing shed to the proposed new location of a side lot line.

CONDITIONS:      1. The variance approval is valid for a period of 18 months from the date of Council’s decision.

REASON FOR DECISION:  

The Committee considered the variance to be minor, to maintain the appropriate development of the lands and to maintain the general intent of the zoning by-law and official plan.

EFFECT OF WRITTEN AND ORAL SUBMISSIONS:     

No public comments were received on this application so there was no effect on the decision. Agency comments were received in support of the application, the effect of which resulted in the decision to approve the application.